Site Search

 

 

 

 

 

Home
General Topics
       Residual Renal Function
          The Importance of RRF
          Contrast Media
       Diabetes Management
          General Facts
          Pathophysiology
          PD and the Diabetic Patient
       Renal Osteodystrophy
          Renal Osteodystrophy Clinical Studies
       Numbers-Their Use and Interpretation
       Basic Statistics
       Choices for Home Dialysis
       Other
          Vaccinating CKD and Dialysis Patients
          32 yr dialysis patient receives Achievement award
Peritoneal Dialysis
       History of PD
          PD - The Foundations
          Early Clinical Experiences with PD
       Kinetic Principles
          Basic Principles of PD
             What is Dialysis?
             Anatomy of the Peritoneum
             Physiology of the Peritoneum
          StdKt/V - Dose Equivalency
       Peritoneal Transport 
          Understanding Testing Methods
          Prognostic Value of Transport Status
          Peritoneal Function After Exposure to PD
       Modalities of Therapy
          PD Techniques
          PD Modalities
       PD Adequacy
          Prescribing Dialysis
             Targets of PD Prescription
             Determinants of Dose
             Exchange Volume and Position
             How to Reach the Goals
             Monitoring the PD Patient
             Evaluating the Patient as a Whole
             Response to Inadequate Peritoneal Dialysis
          Difficulties in Providing Adequate Dialysis
       Ultrafiltration
          Importance of Volume Control
          How to Achieve Adequate PD UF
       Clinical Procedures
       Complications
          Non-Infectious Complications of PD
          Peritoneal Dialysis-Related Infections
             Peritonitis
             Management of ESI
       Dialysis Access
          The Evolution of PD Catheters
          Preop Management
          Placement of PD Catheters
          Intraoperative Management
          Post Operative Care and Management
          Complications of PD Catheters
       Clinical Outcomes
          Clinical outcomes of PD and HD
       Peritoneal Dialysis in Children
          Pediatric ESRD Incidence, Prevalence and Mortality
          Management of the pediatric patient on PD
          Utilization of PD for Acute Renal Failure and ESRD
          Prescription principles, adequacy and PET
          Additional care considerations: Nutrition, Growth,
       Dialysis Equipment & Disposables
          PD Solutions
       PD in the ICU
       Home Program Management
Hemodialysis
       History of Hemodialysis
       Kinetic Principles
          Impact of t & Kr on Kt/V
          StdKt/V - Dose Equivalency
       Modalities of Therapy
          Hemodialysis Regimens/Prescriptions
          Extracorporeal Modalities
       Home HD
          Introduction
          HD Regimens/Prescriptions
          The Influence of Dose, Time & Frequency
          Every other day HD (HD3.5)
          Time Versus Dialysis-Free Interval
          Benefits of Increased HD Frequency
          Increased Frequency – Other Modalities
          Potential Lifestyle Benefits of HD3.5
          Home Program Management
             Establishing a Home Program
       Intradialytic Complications
       Adequacy
          Difficulties in Prescribing Adequate Dialysis
       Sodium Modeling
       Hemodialysis Access
          Introduction to Vascular Access
          Overview of Arteriovenous Fistula
          Overview of Arteriovenous Grafts
          Overview of Central Venous Catheters
          Vascular Access Monitoring and Surveillance
       Access Complications
          Overview of Hemodialysis Complications
          AVF Stenosis
          Interventions for AVF and AVG Stenosis
          Primary Fistula Failure
          Catheter Related Bacteremia
Sorbent Technology
       History of Sorbent Technology
Seminars & Education
       WebEx Physician Courses
       WebEx Teleconference Workshops
       Online Nursing Courses
Educational Initiatives
Training Resources
       Kidney Options Kidney Options
       Patient Training Resources
       Training Resources for Professionals Training Resources for Professionals
Product Information
       Peritoneal Dialysis
          Fresenius Peritoneal Dialysis Connections
       Hemodialysis
Glossary
Links
       Journals
       Organizations
       Other Links
Contact Information
Calendar of Events
Contributors
Peritoneal Dialysis > Complications > Peritoneal Dialysis-Related Infections > Peritonitis

Peritonitis

Please note that this page is currently being revised to reflect the ISPD Peritoneal dialysis-related infections recommendations: 2010 Update. 

The below should be considered background information only.

 

Peritonitis has always been an important complication of PD.  Modern systems have significantly reduced its incidence to typical rates of 0.5 episodes/year or less.  Contributing factors to the reduction of peritonitis are:

  • Improved connectology
  • Flush-before-fill (disconnect systems)
  • Automated peritoneal dialysis

Peritonitis was one of the principal causes of PD technique failure in the 1980’s, but now it is by far superseded by inadequate dialysis.  The peritonitis rates have markedly dropped for CAPD during the last decade with the use of disconnect systems, while that of APD has remained relatively stable.  Nonetheless, lower peritonitis rates for APD are still being reported by the vast majority of investigators when compared to CAPD.

 

Reference

Disconnect CAPD

APD

de Fijter et al., 19941

0.94

0.52

Gahrmani et al., 19952

0.52

0.83

Viglino et al., 1995 3

0.32

0.30

Diaz-Buxo et al., 19984

0.60

0.46

Troidle et al., 1998 5

1.15

1.20

Locatelli et al ., 1999 6

1.44

0.63

Rodriguez et al., 1999 7

0.64

0.31

Perez-Fontan et al., 19998

0.75

0.34

Bro et al., 19999

0.31

0.17

Huang et al., 200110

0.28

0.15

Oo, et al., 2005 11

0.70

0.75

 

The International Society of Peritoneal Dialysis (ISPD) has published guidelines/recommendations for peritoneal dialysis-related infections since 1996.  The latest update was published in 200512.  Click here for ISPD Guidelines

 

In addition, we provide alternate algorithms taking into consideration the ISPD recommendations, but intended to simplify therapy once a decision has been made to use or avoid vancomycin.  Click here for Peritonitis Treatment AlgorithmsTable 1 and Table 2

 

Arguments against abandoning vancomycin and aminoglycosides as empiric treatment of peritonitis and adopting first and third generation cephalosporins

 

The cure rate for vancomycin and cefazolin have been reported to be equally effective by some13,14, but not by most15-17.  Flanigan and Lim15 compared the initial efficacy of continuous vancomycin and cefazolin in a prospective randomized trial and reported the initial cure rate of vancomycin to be significantly better (84 vs 67%; p = 0.01). Furthermore, the rates of hospitalization, superinfection and relapse were also significantly lower for vancomycin.  Vancomycin was significantly better for both Staphylococcus aureus and for coagulase-negative staphylococcus (CoNS).  Others have also reported lower overall cure rates for cefazolin when compared to vancomycin16,17.

 

There is concern about the use of cefazolin due to its lack of efficacy against methicillin resistant organisms, most commonly CoNS.  CoNS are responsible for 15 to 43% of peritonitis episodes and the frequency of resistance to cefazolin ranges from 39 to 88%18-23.  Methicillin resistance is no longer confined to CoNS organisms.  Over recent years several centers have reported increasing numbers of coagulase positive staphylococci (S. aureus) to be methicillin resistant23.  Based on this, it may be considered inappropriate to use a regimen that is ineffective in over 20% of all peritonitis episodes and that will delay therapy until the results of cultures and sensitivities become available.  Thus, it is imperative to consider the center’s experience and incidence of methicillin resistant organisms in order to make a responsible choice of empiric therapy. 

 

Let us now consider the problem with vancomycin resistance.  The incidence of vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) is over 20% in certain locations and VRE are responsible for a significant proportion of peritonitis episodes in other locations24-26.  Vancomycin—resistant CoNS peritonitis have also been reported27,28.  More importantly, while not yet reported to cause peritonitis, vancomycin-intermediately sensitive S. aureus (VISA) have been recently identified29-32. The emergence of these resistance organisms emphasize that vancomycin must not be used indiscriminately.  To this effect, the user is referred to the CDC guidelines for the prevention and spread of vancomycin resistance33.  These guidelines caution against the use of vancomycin for routine prophylaxis, but does not discourage the responsible use of this antibiotic for empiric therapy of patients when the prevalence of methicillin resistance is substantial.

 

The use of many antibiotics aside from vancomycin has been associated with the development of VRE infections.  Foremost among them are third generation cephalosporins24,34.  Some authorities feel that the excessive use of cephalosporins is the driver for the increase in enterococcal infections and their by-product, VRE18,35.  Actually, the development of VRE has been reported to have been associated with a higher use of cephalosporins (93%) preceding the infection than vancomycin (56%)36. Conversely, other studies suggest that reducing the use cephalosporins may affect the rate of development of  VRE infection25, while reducing the use of vancomycin may not accomplish the same results34

 

A vast body of literature documents the development of ceftazidime-resistant Enterobacteriae  as well as other bacteria, including Klebsiella37-41.  This resistance results from point mutations within genes that encode widely prevalent and transferable plasmid-mediated enzymes13,38.  These mutations confer bacteria the ability to hydrolyze cephalosporins and make them resistant to cefazidime and other antibiotics, including penicillins and beta-lactamase inhibitors.      

 

The aforementioned arguments, based on an extensive body of literature, raise significant concerns regarding the abandonment of vancomycin and aminoglycosides as empiric therapy for peritonitis in peritoneal dialysis.  Despite the remarkable reduction in the rate of peritonitis during the past decade, this complication remains a serious cause of morbidity and technique failure.

 

What should we do: use cephalosporins only or revert to the use of vancomycin and aminoglycosides for empiric therapy of peritonitis?

 

This is a complex issue that cannot be delegated to an algorithm.  It requires physician input, based on his knowledge of the specific patient, local epidemiology and quality of the microbiologic facilities in the community.  The frequent previous use of antibiotics in a particular patient and the type of organisms responsible for previous infections should be considered in the selection of therapy.  Recurrent peritonitis should raise the possibilities of inadequate dosing, resistance to previous antibiotics or undiagnosed secondary organisms.  The presence of VRE, methicillin resistant CoNS and coagulase positive staphylococcus or VISA in the community raises another set of questions that should increase the level of suspicion and aggressiveness of treatment.  The ability of the patient to self-administer continuous antibiotic therapy at home and the availability of antibiotics in some regions of the world are also practical considerations in the selection of therapy.  Finally, we should stress the importance of specific therapy based on susceptibility profiles.  Of course, by the time these become available empiric therapy is under way.

 

 

References:

  1. de Fijter CWH, Oe LP, Nauta JJ, van der MJ, Verbrugh HA, Verhoef J, Donker AJ. Clinical efficacy and morbidity associated with continuous cyclic compared with continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Ann Intern Med 120:264-271, 1994
  2. Gahrmani N, Gorban-Brennan N, Kliger AS, Finkelstein FO. Infection rates in end-stage renal disease patients treated with CCPD and CAPD using the UltraBagTM system.  Adv Perit Dial 11:164-166, 1995
  3. Viglino G, Gandolfo C, Virga G, Cavalli PL. Role of automated peritoneal dialysis within a peritoneal dialysis program.  Adv Perit Dial 11:134-138, 1995
  4.  Diaz-Buxo JA. Continuous ambulatory and continuous cycling peritoneal dialysis. In: Ronco C (ed). Peritoneal Dialysis. Milano: Wichtig Editore, 1986: 257-264
  5. Troidle L, Gorban-Brennan N, Kliger AS, Finkelstein FO. Continuous cycler therapy, manual peritoneal dialysis therapy, and peritonitis. Adv Perit Dial 14:137-141, 1998
  6. Locatelli A, Marcos G, Gomez M, Alvarez S, DeBenedetti L.  Comparing peritonitis in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis patients versus automated peritoneal dialysis patients. Adv Perit Dial 15:193-196, 1999
  7. Rodríguez-Carmona A, Fontán MP, Falcón TG, Rivera CF, Valdés F. A comparative analysis on the incidence of peritonitis and exit-site infection in CAPD and automated peritoneal dialysis. Perit Dial Int 19:253-258, 1999
  8. Perez-Fontan M, Rodríguez-Carmona A, García-Falcón T, Fernández-Rivera C, Valdés F. Incidence of peritonitis (P) and exit site infection (ESI) in CAPD and automated PD (APD).  A comparative study. Perit Dial Int 19(Suppl 1):S35, 1999
  9. Bro S, Bjorner J, Tofte-Jensen P, Klem S, Almtoft B, Danielsen H, Meincke M, Friedberg M, Feldt-Rasmussen B. A prospective, randomized multicenter study comparing APD and CAPD treatment. Perit Dial Int 19:526-533, 1999
  10. Huang JW, Hung K-Y, Yen CJ, Wu KD, Tsai TJ. Comparison of infectious complications in peritoneal dialysis patients using either a twin-bag system or automated peritoneal dialysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant 16:604-607, 2001
  11. Oo TN, Roberts TL, Collins AJ. A comparison of peritonitis rates from the United States Renal Data System database: CAPD versus continuous cycling peritoneal dialysis patients. Am J Kidney Dis 45:372-380, 2005
  12. Piraino B, Bailie GR, Bernardini J, Boeschoten E, Gupta A, Holmes C, Kuijper EJ, Li PK-T, Lye W-C, Mujais S, Paterson DL, Perez Fontan M, Ramos A, Schaefer F, Uttley L.  ISPD Guidelines/Recommendations.  Peritoneal dialysis-related infecions recommendations: 2005 Update.  Perit Dial Int 25:107-131, 2005
  13. Korzets Z, Lang R. On the recent recommendations of the Ad Hoc Advisory Committee on the Peritonitis Management – Or should ceftazidime be used as initial empiric therapy? Perit Dial Int 21:319-320, 2001
  14. Kent JR, Almond MK. A survey of CAPD peritonitis management and outcomes in north and south Thames NHS regions (U.K.): Support of the ISPD Guidelines Perit Dial Int 20: 301-305, 2000
  15. Flanigan MJ, Lim VS.  Initial treatment of dialysis associated peritonitis: A controlled trial of vancomycin versus cefazolin.  Perit Dial Int 11:31-37, 1991
  16. Gucek A, Bren AF, Lindic J, et al.  Is monotherapy with cefazolin or ofloxacin an adequate treatment for peritonitis in CAPD patients? Adv Perit Dial 10:144-146, 1994
  17. Alves FR, Dantas RC. Is the treatment of beta lactam sensitive infections without vancomycin possible?  Perit Dial Int 17(Suppl 1): S27, 1997 (Abstract)
  18. Teitelbaum I.  Vancomycin for the initial therapy of peritonitis: Don’t throw out the baby with the bathwater.  Perit Dial Int 21:235-238, 2001
  19. Hockensmith ML, Madinger NE, Teitelbaum I. Concerns regarding recommendations for the treatment of CAPD peritonitis. Perit Dial Int 21:317-319, 2001
  20. Vas S, Bargman JM, Oreopoulos DG. Treatment in PD patients of peritonitis caused by Gram-positive organisms with single daily dose of antibiotics. Perit Dial Int 17: 91-94, 1997
  21. Sandoe JAT,  Gokal R, Struthers JK. Vancomycin-resistant enterococci and empirical vancomycin for CAPD peritonitis. Perit Dial Int 17: 617-618, 1997
  22. Onozato ML, Caramori JCT, Barretti P. Initial treatment of CAPD peritonitis:  Poor response with association of cefazolin and amikacin. Perit Dial Int 19: 88-89, 1999
  23. Mason NA, Zhang T, Messana J.  Methicillin resistance patterns associated with peritonitis in a university-based peritoneal dialysis center. Perit Dial Int 19:483-486, 1999
  24. Perl TA.  The threat of vancomycin resistance.  Am J Med 106(5A):26S-37D, 1999
  25. Murray BE. Drug therapy: Vancomycin-resistant enterococcal infections. N Engl J  Med 342:710-721, 2000
  26. Troidle L, Kliger AS, Gorban-Brennan N, et al.  Nine episodes of CPD-associated peritonitis with vancomycin resistant enterococci. Kidney Int 50: 1368-1372, 1996
  27. Schwalbe RS, Spapleton Jt, Gilligan PH.  Emergence of vancomycin resistance in coagulase-negative staphylococci.  N Engl J Med 316:927-931, 1987
  28. Sanyal D, Johnson AP, George RC, et al.  Peritonitis due to vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis.  Lancet 337:54, 1991
  29. Hiramatsu K, Aritaka N, Hanaki H, et al.  Dissemination in Japanese hospitals of strains of Staphylococcus aureus heterogeneously resistant to vancomycin.  Lancet  350:1679-1673, 1997
  30. Smith TL, Pearson TL, Wilcox KR, et al.  Emergence of vancomycin-resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. N Engl J Med 340:493-501, 1999
  31. Sieradzki K, Roberts RB, Haber SW, Tomasz A.  The development of vancomycin resistance in a patient with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection. N Engl J Med 340:517-523, 1999
  32. Rotun SS, McMath V, Schoonmaker DJ, et al. Staphylococcus aureus with reduced susceptibility to vancomycin isolated from a patient with fatal bacteremia.  Emerg Infect Dis 5:147-149, 1999
  33. Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee.  Recommendations for preventing the spread of vancomycin resistance.  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol  16:105-13, 1995
  34. Morris JG, Shay DK, Hebden JN, et al.  Enterococci resistance of multiple antimicrobial agents, including vancomycin: Establishment of endemicity in a university medical center,  Ann Intern Med 123:250-259, 1995
  35. Barlett JG, Bradley SF, Herwaldt LA, et al.  A roundtable discussion of antibiotic resistance:  Putting the lessons to work.  Am J Med 106(5A):48S-52S, 1999
  36. Uttley AHC, George RC, Naidoo J, et al.  High-level vancomycin-resistant enterococci causing hospital infections.  Epdemio Infect 103:173-181, 1989
  37. Ballow CH, Shcentag JJ. Trends in antibiotic utilization and bacterial resistance.  Report of the National Nosocomial Resistance Surveillance Group.  Diagn Microbio Infect Dis 15(Suppl 2):37S-42S, 1992
  38. Rice LB.  Successful interventions for Gram-negative resistance to extended spectrum beta-lactam antibiotics.  Pharmacotherapy 19(8 Pt 2):120S-128S and 133S-137S, 1999
  39. Landman D, Chockalingam M, Quale JM.  Reduction in the incidence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and ceftazidime-resistant Klebsiella pneumonia following changes in a hospital antibiotic formulary.  Clin Infect Dis 28:1062-1066, 1999
  40. Mebis J, Goosens H, Bruyneel P, et al.  Decreasing antibiotic resistance of Enterobacteriaceae by introducing a new antibiotic combination therapy for neutropenic fever patients.  Leukemia 12:1627-1629, 1998
  41. Meyer KS, Urban C, Eagan JA, et al.  Nosocomial outbreaks of Klebsiella infection resistant to late-generation cephalosporins.  Ann Intern Med 119:353-358, 1993

 

Print  Syndicate  
© 2006-2010, Fresenius Medical Care North America. All Rights Reserved. | Terms Of Use | Privacy Statement | Register | Login