Site Search

 

 

 

 

 

Home
General Topics
       What is Dialysis?
       Residual Renal Function
          The Importance of RRF
       Diabetes Management
          PD and the Diabetic Patient
          General Facts: Diabetes
       Renal Osteodystrophy
          Renal Osteodystrophy Clinical Studies
       Numbers-Their Use and Interpretation
       Basic Statistics
       Other
          Vaccinating CKD and Dialysis Patients
          32 yr dialysis patient receives Achievement award
Peritoneal Dialysis
       History of PD
          PD - The Foundations
          Early Clinical Experiences with PD
       Basic Principles of PD
          Anatomy of the Peritoneum
          Physiology of the Peritoneum
       Peritoneal Transport 
          Understanding Testing Methods
          Transport Status:Classification and Implications
          Peritoneal Function After Exposure to PD
       Modalities of Therapy
          PD Techniques
          PD Modalities
       PD Adequacy
          Prescribing Dialysis
             Targets of PD Prescription
             Determinants of Dose
             Exchange Volume and Position
             How to Reach the Goals
             Monitoring the PD Patient
             Evaluating the Patient as a Whole
             StdKt/V - Dose Equivalency
       Ultrafiltration
          Importance of Volume Control
          How to Achieve Adequate PD UF
       Clinical Procedures
       Complications
          Non-Infectious Complications of PD
          Peritoneal Dialysis-Related Infections
             Management of ESI
             Diagnosis and Treatment of Peritonitis 
       Dialysis Access
          The Evolution of PD Catheters
          Preop Management
          Placement of PD Catheters
          Intraoperative Management
          Post Operative Care and Management
          Complications of PD Catheters
       Clinical Outcomes
          Clinical outcomes of PD and HD
       Peritoneal Dialysis in Children
          Pediatric ESRD Incidence, Prevalence and Mortality
          Management of the pediatric patient on PD
          Utilization of PD for Acute Renal Failure and ESRD
          Prescription principles, adequacy and PET
          Additional care considerations: Nutrition, Growth,
       PD in the ICU
       Home Program Management
Hemodialysis
       History of Hemodialysis
       Kinetic Principles
          Impact of t & Kr on Kt/V
          StdKt/V - Dose Equivalency
       Modalities of Therapy
          Hemodialysis Regimens/Prescriptions
          Extracorporeal Modalities
       Home HD
          Introduction
          HD Regimens/Prescriptions
          The Influence of Dose, Time & Frequency
          Every other day HD (HD3.5)
          Time Versus Dialysis-Free Interval
          Benefits of Increased HD Frequency
          Increased Frequency – Other Modalities
          Potential Lifestyle Benefits of HD3.5
          Home Program Management
             Establishing a Home Program
       Intradialytic Complications
       Adequacy
          Difficulties in Prescribing Adequate Dialysis
       Sodium Modeling
       Hemodialysis Access
          Introduction to Vascular Access
          Overview of Arteriovenous Fistula
          Overview of Arteriovenous Grafts
          Overview of Central Venous Catheters
          Vascular Access Monitoring and Surveillance
       Access Complications
          Overview of Hemodialysis Complications
          AVF Stenosis
          Interventions for AVF and AVG Stenosis
          Primary Fistula Failure
          Catheter Related Bacteremia
Sorbent Technology
       History of Sorbent Technology
Seminars & Education
Educational Initiatives
Training Resources
       Kidney Options Kidney Options
       Patient Training Resources
       Training Resources for Professionals Training Resources for Professionals
Product Information
       Peritoneal Dialysis
          Fresenius Peritoneal Dialysis Connections
          WebEx Teleconference Workshops
       Hemodialysis
       Home Hemodialysis
Glossary
Links
       Journals
       Organizations
       Other Links
Contact Information
Calendar of Events
Contributors

Rate of RRF Loss

Download to PDF

Several reports have suggested that RRF is better preserved among patients treated with PD as compared to HD1-5. Many of these observations are based on either single center uncontrolled studies or on theoretical considerations. Possible explanations for PD superiority in maintaining RRF are:

 

Better control of arterial blood pressure due to more uniform and gradual ultrafiltration. A stable blood pressure should prevent intermittent glomerular ischemia during episodes of hypotension or glomerular capillary hypertension during periods of volume expansion.

More steady concentration of solutes in blood with avoidance of significant fluctuations in osmolality. Tubular and capillary injury from transient hyperosmolar states could contribute to loss of RRF.

Differences in protein intake between PD and HD patients. A lower protein intake has been associated with better preservation of RRF. Patients undergoing PD often have lower protein intakes, possibly related to a lower Kt/Vurea. A high and sustained intake of dietary protein has been proposed to increase renal blood flow and glomerular filtration rates, which require additional renal work, recruitment of reserve glomeruli and the eventual development of intra-renal hypertension leading to glomerular sclerosis and loss of renal function6.

Protein losses. Similarly, the continuous loss of protein through the peritoneal effluent may lessen the filtration load each nephron must handle among patients on PD.

Higher nephrotoxicity in HD. The intermittent exposure of blood to hemodialyzers, tubing and other components of extracorporeal circuits has been associated with secretion of cytokines (IL-1, tumor necrotizing factor, etc) and other mediators of inflammation known to accelerate loss of RRF. Much progress has been made in the development of more biocompatible HD components to minimize the production of undesirable cytokines, but this possibility is still an important consideration. Conversely, increased cytokine secretion has also been associated with the use of conventional PD solutions. The latter has stimulated research in the development of more physiological solutions and biocompatible materials for use in PD.

 

While most clinical reports strongly suggest better preservation of RRF in PD and the physiological considerations support this belief, other investigators have not been able to confirm this finding7,8. Tattersall studied 100 patients undergoing HD and PD and performed an exponential regression of Krt/V against time7. During the first year of treatment, RRF contributed the equivalent of Krt/V = 1.0. No significant difference in the rate of renal failure progression was noted among the groups. In a subsequent study, these same authors compared the decline of urea clearance in a cohort of 475 incident ESRD patients who received treatment with CAPD (N=175) or hemodialysis (HD) utilizing high-flux polysulphone membranes, ultrapure water, and bicarbonate as the buffer (N=300)8.  There was no difference in the mean urea clearance in each group at dialysis initiation, or at any 6-month time point during the ensuing 48 months. This was true even after exclusion of patients who had died in the first year after initiation, those transferred to another dialysis modality, or those who had been transplanted. Only age and chronic interstitial disease predicted retention of urea clearance at one year.  It seemed apparent that in hemodialysis using high-flux biocompatible membranes and ultrapure water, RRF declines at a rate indistinguishable from that in CAPD. This may have important implications, since preservation of RRF has major benefits and is a valid therapeutic goal.

 

The rate of loss of RRF is difficult to predict due to the aforementioned factors influencing renal function preservation and inter-patient peculiarities. However, Gotch, et al. have published the rate of fall in Krt/V from a randomized dialysis prescription and clinical outcomes study9. The observed decline was 0.21 Krt/V + 0.34/6 months or 0.035/month.

 

The specific disease entities and comorbid conditions responsible for ESRD can also influence the rate of deterioration of RRF. Inter-patient variation in the progression of renal failure is well known. Diabetic patients with generalized vasculopathy, those presenting with vasculitis and certain forms of focal sclerosing glomerulonephropathy often show a rapid rate of progression, while certain patients with tubulointerstitial disease progress remarkably slowly. In addition, nephrotoxic insults may be more prone to play a role in some groups of patients. A classic example is radiographic contrast media. Two risk factors in the development of acute renal failure from contrast media are the severity of renal failure and the coexistence of diabetes mellitus10. Diabetics are at high risk of developing coronary artery disease and other vascular complications. Many transplant programs recommend or require a thorough cardiac work-up, including coronary arteriograms, for diabetics. Therefore, the use of contrast media may play an important role in the loss of RRF in certain series.

 

Back to The Importance of RRF

 

Next

 

References:

  1. Lysaght MJ, Vonesh EF, Gotch F, Ibels L, Lindholm B, Keen M, Nolph KD, Pollock CA, Prowant B, Farrell PC. The influence of dialysis treatment modality on the decline of remaining renal function. Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs 37:598-604, 1991
  2. Rottembourg J. Residual renal function and recovery of renal function in patients treated by CAPD. Kidney Int 43:S106-S110, 1993
  3. Cancarini GC, Brunori G, Camerini C, Brasa S, Manili L, Maiorca R. Renal function recovery and maintenance of residual diuresis in CAPD and hemodialysis. Perit Dial Bull 6:77-79, 1986
  4. Kim DJ, Park JA, Huh W, Kim YG, Oh HY. The effect of hemodialysis during break-in period on residual renal function in CAPD patients. Perit Dial Int 20:784-785, 2000
  5. Lameire N, Biesen WV. The impact of residual renal function on the adequacy of peritoneal dialysis. Perit Dial Int 17:S102-S110, 1997
  6. Brenner BM, Meyer TW, Hostetter TH. Dietary protein intake and the progressive nature of kidney disease: the role of hemodynamically mediated glomerular injury in the pathogenesis of progressive glomerular sclerosis in aging, renal ablation, and intrinsic renal disease. N Engl J Med 307:652-659, 1982
  7. Tattersall JE.  Is continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis an adequate long-term therapy for end-stage renal disease. Semin Dial  8:72-76, 1995
  8. McKane W, Chandna SM, Tattersall JE, Greenwood RN, Farrington K. Identical decline of residual renal function in high-flux biocompatible hemodialysis and CAPD.  Kidney Int 61:256-265, 2002
  9. Gotch F, Gentile DE, Keen M, Amerling R, Folkert VW, Kliger A, Shapiro WB. The incident patient cohort study design with uncontrolled dose substantial over-estimation of mortality as a function of peritoneal dialysis dose? ASAIO J 42:M514-M517, 1996
  10. Diaz-Buxo JA, Wagoner RA, Palumbo PA, Hattery R. Acute renal failure following excretory urography in azotemic diabetics. Ann Intern Med 83:155-158, 1975
Print  
© 2006-2012, Fresenius Medical Care North America. All Rights Reserved. | Terms of Use | Privacy Statement | Register | Login